Audible Frequency Spectrum - Effects and Signal Processing

A look at the audible frequency spectrum - Effects and Signal Processing - Home Recording Studio Help

Tricks You Use All The Time To Give Your Tracks That Extra Something...

I know i have a few effects / settings i pull up in every new track i work on and i was curious what some of the things are you guys like to use are.

1. New thing i've learned about - Parallel compression. This on drums brings things to life and fills them out a bit. My drums sounded holo and unprofessional before this trick and just adding a bit of it goes a long way with the sound of everything.

2. Sidechaining. I usually have 2 Sidechain channels going at the same time with just some random duplicated bassdrum kick to trigger it. I have one that's super heavy and more of an effect (That pumping sound) and i use one that's more subtle if i just want to give more room in the mix and try to not have it be as noticeable.

3. Massive reverb tails reversed as intros. I'll use a big reverb tail and bounce a solo track to bring in a new sound / element. It sounds a lot smoother than just hitting a crash and bringing in a new segment. It sounds a lot less like you just slapped a bunch of loops together.

4. Simple Drum fills. These have become KEY in turning a track around from being too tracky. Snares are the easiest to do and get the job done, but if you are super good with drums you could do much more with your fills like with toms and cymbals etc.

5. Making sure my track is super DJ Friendly. 1 Minute intro, 2 minute outro with the bass dropping after 1 minute. This way somebody could just pop the track in without knowing much about it and mix it pretty much flawlessly.

6. Noise sweeps with a ton of dely/reverb. There are a lot of ways to get the effect, but the simplest one is white noise with a bandpass filter going from low to high. Works really well and with a long tail adds a lot of build up for breakdowns and big transitions.

Hopefully you guys have some more awesome tips that can help all of us

-Josh Billings
___________________

just simple but automating delays, but automation in general.

Used to think it was swing and shuffle settings i needed but it was sync'd delays and shifting their timing for the swing i wanted.

and the automation - for making simple kind of minimal stuff then without automation its just basically shit here. Can get the sounds decent but doest really come alive and speak so to speak until automation. did i say automation.

For intro style stuff i like to assigne master tempo to a midi control. and have plenty controlls on fx, sends to reverb/delays and controlls on them etc etc. then a few samplers looping with controlls to to start/end points. then just hit play and twist knobs - more of a techno result here.
___________________

I started paying more attention to the frequencies usind voxengo frequency analyzer. You will be amazed how much cleaner you cen get your track to be with simple elimination of low frequencies in elements that don't need it. For example just because its a hi-hat doeas not automatically mean that it does't have lows when sampled (there could be a reverb tail hiding in the low frequencies). Pop your analyzer and check, I try to cut all the elements in my mix at about 150 on exception to KICK and BASS. I mean 150 is just an estimate, some more a little more.
And effects effects effects!!! I used to be afraid to use a lot of reverb and delay because I felt my mix was becoming out of controll, but dam without effects there is no life in the track.

Ghots loops also help for movement, I take a loop and put it underneath my drum sequance and cut like 200-300 low ferquences out and have it sit very quet in the back of the mix, really helps to fill up some space.

And I officially compress every element in the mix, just a little but I still do...unless its been compressed already. I just love how compression adds wormth and makes the elemets big sounding...don't get me wrong, just a little bit not a whole lot

_________________________

Question:
I am interested, what do you guys think about adding some reverb on the whole drum channel and using it along with the parallel compression, if not the whole drum channel, what would you send to it?

Answer:
Make sure you have another Dry Drum channel, then you can send to another buss and put reverb there(but makes usre you cut the lows on the reverb bus). On top of that you can have another drum channel and thats were you scwash the shit out of the drums. That way you have thee chennels. If you got enough juice in your system take all these three channels and send it to one Big drum group, and add some compression on it. And Now you have yourself one FAT sound Oh and even on the buss with parallel compression make sure you cut like 80-100hz so the dry kick is got space to breath.

I got a great way to create melodies. CHECK IT OUT...

Ok, heres what i do now when im stuck. I walk away and literally walk from my pc/keyboards. I go for a walk and try singing the melodies and i come up with thm this way.

I use the line I will always love you and manipulate it in a thousand ways with emphasis on holds and pauses, like this for ex.

I (pause pause pause)will always(hold) love you(hold)
I will always(long pause)love you
I(pause)will(pause)always(pause)love(hold)you(hold)
I will always love(pause)you(hold)
and etc.

of course you can throw in any line you want
I(pause)am an american(pause) gang(pause)star
I am an american(pause) gangster
and etc.

Play around with this, and im serious when i say WALK AWAY FROM YOUR INSTRUNMENT, once you got a good catchy melody in your head, trust me, you wont forget it, it will eat at you, then go to your jeys and bang that ish out.

Okay i sure hope this helped some, this has greatly helped me out especially during times of beat block
_______________________________________

The Inspiration Bank

Hey all,

Here's a trick that I've used for a while that really helps me out. As a music maker, I often find myself being inspired by ideas i hear in other people's work. As a musician, being receptive to this sort of observation is critical to maintaining a fresh sound and truly refining your production and composing skills. The only problem is that its difficult to keep all of the things that have inspired you in your mind at all times; good ideas are only useful if you have them at the right times.

The trick that I've devised for getting around this inspiration bottleneck is to use the computer to keep a cache of ideas for me. When I hear a section of a song i really appreciate and would like to use as an idea for a future project, I load that section into an audio editor, cut out that loop and save it in a Inspiration Bank folder. to make browsing easier, I have mine divided into such categories as:

Breakdowns
Introductions
Grooves
Basslines
Riffs
Transitions
Chord Progressions
Sound Selection/ Instrumentation
etc.

when I find myself needing inspiration in any of these areas, I have my ideas already lined up and ready to help me out. As an additional tip, I suggest spending at least 1 hour every week adding stuff to this bank. One of the best parts of this technique is that by copying and saving things that inspire you, your bank will truly come to reflect your own production style and values.

Please let me know your thoughts

-Lodger

Tarekith - Guide to Mastering for Beginners

Guide to Mastering for Beginners
v1.01

By Tarekith

I'm writing this because I have been seeing the same questions asked more and more these days, "How do I master my song?" or "Can anyone recommend some good mastering plug ins?" I guess this is a natural thing, as more and more people are learning the ins and outs of their home studios, they eventually start to finish songs and realize that they don't sound as good, or as 'polished' as what they hear when they buy a CD or download tunes online.

So, to start with, who am I and why should you read this? I'll be the first person to admit that I am not a mastering engineer, though someday I truly hope to be. I hate to use the term mastering for what I do even, as it is slightly insulting to those people who truly are mastering engineers in every sense of the word. However, for the last 4 or 5 years I've been asked by many, many people to help them get their songs sounding polished, as they tended to like the work I had done on my own songs. As this is what most people consider mastering, inevitably it gets called that and I get sick of always correcting people. Anyway, through word of mouth I've done about 400+ songs, and 60 or so DJ mixes at this point, and never had anyone ask for their money back (whew!). Just some background so people don't think I'm just talking without any experience as I write this.

So, what is mastering (technically it's called Pre-mastering BTW)? Surprisingly it can be many things:

* Making all the songs on a CD sound cohesive.
* Prepping the song so that the playback level is not too quiet, and more importantly these days, not too loud.
* The final quality control for projects going to a replication house.
* An experienced, fresh set of ears to help achieve the overall balance of frequencies in a song.

Just a few examples.

I think the one thing most people want to achieve when it comes to mastering their songs is two-fold though: Getting the overall level of the song right, and getting a good balance of frequencies in the song as well (i.e., making sure it's not too bright or too bassy). The easiest way to achieve this is to let someone with the right gear and the lots of experience handle it. But, if you're reading this, then chances are you really want to do this on your own. So that's not an option. How then, do you go about mastering your own work? What tools do you need to get the job done?

I think it goes without saying that two truths will always remain true when it comes to music production:

1. More expensive gear will almost always give you better results. A $1000 plug in will likely sound clearer and smoother than a free plug in. There's always exceptions, I'm just saying in general.
2. Experience and trained ears will always get you better results than just good gear. That is, an experienced mastering engineer will be able to get very, very good results no matter what they use.

To me, this means one thing. Becoming good at mastering (or anything) will take practice and lots of it, and having good quality tools at hand will help as well. Lacking these two things, there's one more way to approach the situation, and that's trial and error, which to me is a form of practice as well. So where do we start?

The first thing you need to look at is your listening environment. Having good speakers is only one small part of knowing you are hearing everything in your music, especially with any sort of accuracy. Far more important is the way that the sound from your speakers interacts with the room you're in. The best speakers in the world can sound like dog poo if your room is negatively influencing what you hear. I won't go too much into acoustics here, but if you're working in a room with no acoustic treatment (i.e., diffusors, bass traps, etc) you're already starting off with things not in your favor. Given that this sort of stuff can be expensive to address, I'll assume that most of you haven't, which means you need a plan B.

The best way to get around this limitation then, is to make sure that you listen to your song on as many speakers and playback locations as possible. For the longest time my car was my second test location, as I by far listen to more music there than anywhere else. But don't stop there, try your song on your iPod, your home stereo, your kitchen radio, your friends' stereos (they hate this by the 5th or 6th month BTW), etc. Learn how to translate what you hear in your home studio, into what it sounds like elsewhere. Pay attention to things like the bass. If it sounds good in your studio, but you keep noticing it's too bassy elsewhere, then you know you need to compensate for that at home. So you mix and master with the bass sounding weak at home, so that when you test it elsewhere, it sounds good.

It's not that simple though, you need to learn this for the whole frequency spread, the mids, the highs, the low mids, etc. Eventually you'll slowly start to hear what the deficiencies are in your studio, and how to compensate for them. This takes a LONG time. It's not something you do in a day, over a weekend, or even in a couple months. You need to train your ears to always listen for the overall balance of what you are hearing, and then test that against how it sounds in your studio. What's worse, getting better speakers, a new soundcard, or even finally springing for some acoustic treatment all changes this balance and you need to start all over. Without the proper room and gear, this is the only way you'll know what's truly going on in your music: trial and error. So it's not ideal, but my point is that it can be done with enough practice and perseverance.

"Yeah yeah", I hear you muttering, "but how do I master my songs in the first place?"

To put it bluntly, you don't.

What?

Let me say this again, in case you skipped over it. If you are writing and releasing your own songs, there is no reason to “master” them per se.

Everything you need to do to make a song sound good can be done in the mixdown, and this is where you should focus 100% of all your learning and attention if you ask me. There's only one exception, and that's getting the levels more inline with today's standards, and I'll come back to that later.

A good-sounding song doesn't need anything done to it by a mastering engineer. It already sounds good as is. This is what you should strive for. Putting things like multi-band compression, EQ, aural exciters, sonic maximizers and such over your mixed down song is the WRONG way to approach it. Those tools were created to give mastering engineers more flexibility when they didn't the luxury of going back and fixing the individual elements in a song. They were forced to work on a single stereo file of the song, and couldn't adjust anything in the mix. Thus tools like these were created for those RARE instances they needed to adjust something beyond what simple EQ or compression might fix. You have the luxury to go back into your DAW and adjust the problems right at the source, so use it!

If you listen to your completed song and think it needs these tools, then stop and go back and fix your mixdown.

- If the song is too bass heavy, then go back and turn down the bassline and kick, or add some EQ to just those parts.

-If it sounds too mono and centered, start panning some instruments until you get a wider sound-stage. Add some chorus or stereo delay to a part to make it seem wider.

- If it sounds flat and dull, take off all the effects and EQ you added previously and start over. I'd say 90% of the time this “dull” phenomenon is due to people over using tools they don't understand.

Contrary to all the popular magazines, you don't need compression on every single track, especially for electronic music. I maybe use 1 or 2 compressors total in one of my songs, if that. The best way to get a rich-sounding song is to not overdo the effects, and to try and get a good mixdown without using anything but your volume faders first. It's also important to realize that this stuff takes lots and lots of practice (years and years), so even if you do all the above and then some, it's just not going to happen overnight when you're just starting out. Keep experimenting at home in your free time, and eventually you'll get the hang of it. You'd never expect to be as good as Jimi Hendrix on the guitar in a week, and good sounding productions are the exact same. Patience!

The point of all this is simple, if you're doing your own songs and no one else is going to work on them, spend your effort getting it sounding good while doing the mixdown. Burn copies of that and live with them for a week while you play it on as many systems as possible. Always strive to get the mixdown sounding good first. That should be exactly how you want your song to sound. There are no magical tools that will make this better in mastering. By far, you have way more options, and more transparent options, when addressing this while mixing.

If your mixdown is balanced the way you like, then the only thing you're going to notice while playing back your new song everywhere is that it's quieter than everything else out there. This is fine when you're testing the mixdown, just turn up the playback device to compensate.

DO NOT WORRY ABOUT HOW LOUD THE SONG IS UNTIL YOU ARE COMPLETELY DONE WITH IT.

Doing so is only distracting you from what's important, and trust me, it's so simple to fix you don't need to worry about it yet. When you're doing your mixdown, make sure than the master levels in your DAW never go above -6dBFS, and just turn up the playback device to compensate. Here's a quick guide I wrote on setting levels and why you want to leave the master channel alone, for those that want more info:

http://tarekith.com/assets/Leveling.html

It's mainly geared towards Ableton Live DJs, but the principles are the same for all computer-based musicians.

So, you're happy with the way your song sounds. You've listened to it for a couple weeks on multiple systems (yeah right) and it's perfect the way it is, you wouldn't change anything. Well, except for the fact that it's just too quiet still, right? All you need to do now is use a limiter to gently raise the overall volume. The key word here is gently. Far too many songs these days are over-limited purely for the sake of 'apparent' volume, especially dance music. Google "loudness wars" if you really want to read more about it.

There are two ways of applying this limiting: by using a limiter on the master track in your DAW and then rendering the final file, or by rendering the file and then applying limiting in another app like Wavelab, Soundforge, Peak, or WaveEditor. The results should be the same no matter what you use. It mainly comes down to your own working preferences, and if you have enough CPU power left to add a good limiter in your DAW. If you're going to use another app for mastering, render your mixdown as a 24bit file (you should always use 24bit anyway) and make sure Live's normalize function is off when you do.

Anyway, get your best limiter, set the release to Auto, the main output to -0.2dBFS, and then lower the threshold until the very highest peaks of your song are only being limited by about 3dB's. You'll see this on the gain reduction meter. And I mean only the very highest peaks of the song. The GR meter should just barely flicker up to 3dB. If your mixdown was well done and balanced, I'd bet anything that you're pretty close to the ballpark you need to be in. It'll sound pretty competitive with most music out there, in terms of volume. Maybe a touch quieter, but that other music is too loud anyway, right? This is where experience really comes in though. Sometimes you can go more or less than 3dB, but you have to know what to listen for, and when you're truly doing more harm than good. When in doubt, err on the side of caution and use less limiting.

But what if you don't have a limiter? Well, luckily most apps come with a freebie limiter or a limiter preset for one of their compressors, since a limiter is nothing but a compressor with an infinite ratio (or as close to inifinity as we can get digitally). Live for example has a limiter preset for Compressor II (just change the output to -0.2dBFS before you start). While in general I think there's no such thing as a preset in mastering, if you truly don't know what you're doing this is by far the safest option. And since people will ask, my favorite limiters are the Waves L2 and especially the UAD Precision Limiter.

Ok, now you've got the overall spectral balance right, and you've sorted the levels, what's next? The very last thing in preparing your song is to apply dither. Dither is used when converting 24bit (or higher) files to 16bit. So if you're only working with 16bit files, don't worry about it. If you are using a 24bit file for your mixdown, then you want to insert the dither plug in AFTER the limiter, it's always the very last plug in you apply. Always. And you only ever want to apply it once. Since Live did not include a dithering plug in prior to version 7 (tsk tsk Ableton!), you'll need to use a third party one (I like UV22Hr in Wavelab myself). If you don't have a dithering plug in, it's not essential, it just helps to make the 16bit file have a bit more depth (no pun intended). I bet most people would never notice it if you didn't use one, so don't stress too much over this. If you want some examples of what dither can do, here's some I made:

http://tarekith.com/assets/ditherexamples.zip

Basically, you can hear how the dithered version trails off more smoothly than the truncated version, albeit at the expense of some added noise. These examples were boosted A LOT to make the effect more audible, normally this stuff is extremely quiet, like -94dB or so. It's subtle, like I said. This is just a more audible example of it for the sake of understanding. Again, Google or visit wikipedia for more detailed info than I can go into here.

Anyway, that's more or less it. Render your song as a 16bit wav file, burn it to CD, and you're done! I hope I've made it clear that there's really no reason whatsoever to use a complicated mastering chain, or fancy multi-band tools, on your own songs. You will achieve FAR, FAR better sounding results if you do as little as possible to your song outside of your main DAW, and instead focus on getting everything right there first. It's not as complicated as people make it when you're prepping your own material, it's only when people like me or true mastering engineers have to deal with other people's music that it can get complicated and we need to resort to these tools.

I hoped this helped some of you, and if you still want to have someone else master your songs, you can, of course, contact me

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Feel free to pass this document on as you see fit, though I ask that you do not modify it from its current form, and that you give proper credit. If you see any errors, please let me know so I can correct them ASAP. Special thanks to Troy Perry for proofing this article for me.

Tarekith
Tarekith.com

Tarekith - Mixdowns for Beginners

Mixdowns for Beginners
v1.01

by Tarekith

Before I get into the actual tutorial aspects of this guide, I need to briefly insert the usual disclaimers. Every time I write a guide, or a How To related to the music making process, I inevitably get emails from people disputing my ideas or the methods I propose. It's important to understand that I'm in no way saying that the ideas in this guide are the only way to approach a mixdown, nor are they necessarily the 'right' way to do things. I can only share with people my own experiences and the way I learned to do things. Certainly people should always keep an open mind and try any and all alternatives on their quest to create their own sound.

So then, what is a mixdown? In the simplest sense, it's combining all of the separate elements you created while writing your track. But I think it's more than that too. To me, it's about making the sum of all parts greater as a whole, about creating something really inspiring based on various unique combinations of parts capable in a mixdown. Anyone who's ever tried to redo a mix from scratch on one of their songs knows that you can get a vastly different sounding song each time, using the exact same parts. It's how they all interact together that really gives the song it's feel and emphasis.

How do we start then? Most likely, you already have. It's not uncommon for people to actual be crafting a rough mix of the song as they write. If one part is too loud and starting to get on your nerves or distract you as you work on others, you turn it down. If you can no longer hear the bassline for instance, you turned it up. A lot of people will not even approach the mixdown as a separate process, they shape it while they write, and when that phase is done, the song is done and they send it out for mastering. Certainly nothing wrong with this, many a good a tune has been written this way.

But I'm going to write this article assuming you want to learn how to mix a song from scratch. You listen to your song and while you can hear all the elements, it doesn't have the impact you want. Or maybe, it just sounds kind of dull and flat compared to other songs you admire, there's no depth and detail. Sometimes we can fix this just by tweaking a few parts of the rough mixdown you created while writing, other times we need to start totally over with a fresh canvas if you will. Hopefully the ideas below will help you with either method.

Preparation

Where you start can depend completely on what kind of song it is. I personally don't approach a mix this way, the process is largely the same for me regardless of what kind of song it is. But it can be important to start by recognizing what parts of the track are the focus, what is most important. In a pop tune this is largely the vocal, in a dance tune it's the kick and bassline, in an ambient song it could be the textures or pads. So take a second to think about, and to recognize what the focal point is in your song. I don't think you need to necessarily always pay more attention to this while mixing, but certainly you want to always make sure something else isn't over-shadowing it.

To begin with, I tend to follow the school of thought that you should not touch the master fader in your DAW (Digital Audio Workstation, i.e. sequencing/composing software) or your hardware mixer. I leave this set at 0dB, and adjust the individual track faders if the song starts to clip the master output. This is just my preference, but I think it forces you to work in a more consistent fashion, and after time, you can easily learn to avoid this happening as you mix or write.

I also believe in leaving approximately 6dB of headroom in my songs once everything is finally done in the mixdown. This means that once you're done with the mix, the loudest parts of the song will not be above -6dBFS on the master meter. Since we should always be rendering or exporting our mixdown as a 24bit file, this has no negative impact on the amount of detail we can capture in the song, and leaves plenty of room for the mastering engineer to do their work. Even if you're going to master your own song, I recommend this practice, if for no other reason than it ensures you are not unintentionally clipping your song anywhere. If it sounds quieter than you're used to, turn up your monitors or master volume knob on your soundcard some to compensate. For more details, see my mastering guide here:

Tarekith's Guide to Mastering For Beginners

Leaving 6dB of headroom is something you need to think about often while doing the mixdown, so keep an eye on your master level meter, and turn things down if you start seeing the signal go over this value (assuming you're following my recommendation that is!).

On that note, I personally think it's important to keep your monitors fairly quiet while doing a mixdown, for a couple of reasons. First of all, when things are louder, they always sound more exciting. This is a fundamental aspect of the way our ears work, the way we hear different frequencies in relation to others is dependent on the volume we hear them at. (Google Fletcher-Munson curves if you want more info on this phenomenon.) The simple result of this is that while things might sound great at louder volumes, they tend to sound very flat and dull at quieter volumes. However I've found that the reverse is NOT true. If you can make a song sound great at lower volumes, it will only sound that much better when turned up.

Secondly your ears begin to actually get tired when forced to listen to loud music for extended periods of time, something referred to as ear fatigue. After awhile you begin to lose the ability to make accurate decisions based on what you're hearing. Trying harder or forcing yourself to focus more will not help, your ears just will not convey the proper information to your brain anymore. The only way to fix this, is to take a long break from mixing (we're talking hours here, not minutes), and likely you don't want to stop just when things are going well. So keep the volume down for most of your mixing, and only turn it up once in awhile if you need to listen louder as a reference. You should be able to easily talk to another person without raising your voice if you have the volume set right. I'd bet money that in the end you get a better overall result, even if the process might not be as fun as you're used to.

Core Elements

Since most people reading this will largely be in the dance and electronic music crowd, I'll start my imaginary mixdown for this tutorial with the elements I'd say are 'usually' the most important; the kick, snare, bassline, and lead synth/vocal. Likely the first three are where most people start in any type of tune with a strong rhythm, so the same process might apply to other genres and forms of music as well.

The purpose of starting with these parts is two-fold. First, they are likely the core of the song, and what will impact people the most. They are the main elements that the song it built around, so we should focus on the important parts first. Second, there's a practical engineering aspect to this as well, in that these will probably be the loudest parts of the song. So by starting with these, we can make sure that our overall levels are set properly, and that we're not clipping and possibly ruining all of our hard work. I cover the details of proper level setting in my Leveling guide if you want more info:

Leveling for DJ use in Ableton Live

Back to the core elements. Let's start by muting or pulling down the channel faders for every single part in the song. If you have have any return channels you're using, you can leave those unmuted and at 0dB for now. Unmute the kick, snare and bassline, and raise those until you see the master meter hitting about -10 to -8dB's when they sound roughly balanced the way you want. Setting these parts to that level will usually leave us enough room to add the rest of the parts later on, and still achieve that final set point of -6dB on our master fader. These are the strongest parts of most tunes, or perhaps I should say they usually carry the most energy.

The hardest part of getting a good mixdown for most people is the low end, getting the kick and the bassline to not compete with each other, and to not drown out any other instruments. This is something best addressed while writing the track actually. If you know the bassline is really deep and has lots of subs, then likely you'll want to use a kick sound with more beater noise and less low end to keep from competing with the bassline. Likewise if the bassline is more distorted or uses a lot of lowpass filter tweaking to give it more bite (and thus is placed higher in the frequency range), you can get away with deeper kicks, 808 style and all that. But this isn't a hard and fast rule, there's other things we can do to get these two elements working together.

The first thing you should try is just using the volume faders of each to see how well you can blend the two via the simplest means. Sometimes this is all you need to do to get a really great sounding low end in your song. If your kick is still getting lost when the bassline is playing, you might try layering another kick drum sample over the original, this one with a brighter beater sound (that clicky aspect caused by the drum beater hitting the skin). Many times this can go a long way towards making your bass drum stand out more, and is something to think about when you're first writing your drums.

Side-chaining is another viable method, though one that's best used sparingly IMO. With side-chaining, you're triggering a compressor on the bassline line track to basically turn down the volume of the bassline briefly when the kick drum hits. It doesn't work with all basslines and kick drums, so I don't recommend it for all but a few cases. The specifics of side chaining depend largely on what plug ins and DAW you're using, so check the manuals of those for more info on how to do this.

Another option is to use EQ to help the two sit well together. I tend to cut frequencies below 30Hz in both my bass drum and bassline, this improves how much headroom I have in most cases, and helps clean up both sounds and make them less muddy sounding on loud club systems. This is really useful when you're using synthesized kicks and basses, which can have a lot of information down in the lower frequencies that no one will ever hear. Don't do this if you don't need to though, use a spectrum analyzer to actually see if there's something down there to cut in the first place. And you don't need to cut a lot many times, only 5-6dB can make all the difference, don't try and remove these freqs entirely.

What if the opposite is true though, and your bassline or kick lacks a lot of punch and low end? Well, layering a sine wave under the bassline can help this, even if used quietly it can add a lot of low end to the sound. The key is to not overpower the original bassline sound where all the texture and interest is, so keep the level low on this. Ditto on the kick drum, try layering a deeper kick underneath it to add more weight to it. Already we can see that some mixdown problems are really issues with the sounds we choose, and not best addressed in the mixdown!

You can use EQ to cut and boost certain frequencies in each part as well, to help give them their own sonic territory in the frequency spectrum. Maybe you cut a few dB at 80Hz on the bassline, while cutting some at 120Hz on the kick (for example). Follow your ears, there's no right answer, and for each song you'll often need to try a lot of things before you find the one that works the best. On that note, don't get too hung up focusing on any one part while doing a mixdown, it's a sure fire way to get distracted and lose sight of the overall picture. And besides, you could spend days getting these two elements right, and then when you add the rest of the parts of the song back in, realize you can't hear all that work anyway. Work fast, and keep the overall song in perspective while you do. You can always come back to these parts later on if they're not working well with the rest of the song.

Finally I tend to make my basslines and kicks in mono, especially if it's a tune for the dance floor. This way the core foundation for the song sounds the same out of both speakers, and gives the stereo imaging of the song a real center which you can play off of later on, when you add other parts. You don't always have to use a mono bassline, but I've rarely found a good use for stereo kicks.

The snare is the next sound I would approach, and often I'll be working on it the same time as the bass and kick. For rock and breaks music, typically the snare will be mixed a little louder than other forms of music using a 4/4 kick drum. It's more of a focal point, and helps tie together the various rhythm elements to a predictable pattern. If you're using samples of snare drums, then sometimes there's very little you actually need to do to a snare in the mix. I find that over-processing a snare often just takes away from the character that led me to choose that snare in the first place.

There are times that some EQ can solve some issues or improve things though. A dull snare can often be fixed by boosting some around 2kHz, though you have to be careful as this is the main frequency your lead is likely to sit at as well. Boosting around 8kHz and above can add a bit more "air" and openness to the sound. I'd use a low Q value and only a couple dB's of boost on this to keep it as smooth as possible. If the snare sounds flat, like a you're hitting a wet newspaper (i.e. no punch), then a gentle boost around 400Hz can often solve this. It brings out more of the drum sound of the snare, and less of the rattle. Again, don't take the frequency and gain recommendation here as gospel, play around and see what sounds best for each situation.

Sometimes I'll put snares in mono, not always though. If it was something I used a drum synth to make, then likely it was created in mono anyway and it makes no sense to put it in stereo. If it was a stereo sample, then likely I'll keep it that way. It doesn't hurt to try both options and see what you like best. Double check once more that you're master level is not above -6dB while you're at it.

The Lead

When I refer to the 'lead' in a song, it could be the vocal, or perhaps you have a synth that has the main focus in different parts of the song. But it could be just as likely that your song doesn't have a defined lead instrument as well, so don't feel the need to create one if there doesn't need to be one. Because there are literally millions of ways of creating a lead sound, and coming up with new ones is the goal of most producers, I won't go too much into specifics here.

Ideally you want to make sure that the lead is always able to be clearly heard, that it doesn't get buried by other elements of the mixdown. Usually this means that it's slightly louder in comparison (use your ears, not level meters here), but it could just be in it's own frequency range too. If we're talking about vocals, then it's important that people can understand every word. This can be tricky figuring out on your own if you wrote the lyrics or know what they are ahead of time, so maybe get someone else to take a listen when you're done and get a second opinion.

A lot of time I think it's the lead that seems to end up with the most effects in people's songs, at least that's how it seems to me. As with everything, make sure that you have a real need for each effect, overdoing it can often have the opposite effect of burying the lead or making it tiring to listen to. Sometimes a completely dry lead can have the most impact of all too! Remember less is more, especially with something like reverb or delay. Both of these can make a sound seem further away in the mix, like it's being played in the distance. This is one more thing that can make a lead sound dull or unimportant, so use these two effects minimally.

Typically a lead is panned dead center, it's the most important, so you want it coming from both speakers equally. That's not a hard and fast rule though, so experiment if you feel the need. Panning leads back and forth in the speakers can be an ear catching effect if done sparingly, too much and its annoying and can be distracting from other song elements.

By now you should have the main elements of the song working together, the core drums and bass providing a solid foundation, and the lead providing the focal point. Now it's time to add everything else that completes your tune, just remember you don't want to bury these main sounds!

Percussion

The role of the ancillary drum sounds is to support the main groove, so don't make these parts too loud in the mix. Especially hi hats, which I think most beginners tend to make too loud. Sometimes it can be helpful to roll off (gently cut) frequencies below 1kHz when dealing with cymbals, it can make them less intrusive and they sit better with the other drum sounds without getting in the way of any hand or ethnic percussion you might be using. Use your ears, it shouldn't drastically alter the character of the cymbals when you do this, if it does, then think twice about it. Only a few dB's of cut can be enough to make a large difference, so as with all things in mixing, follow the less is more principle. Boosting cymbals and hi hats should be done sparingly as well, it's very easy to make them harsh sounding this way.

Toms and hand percussion, like tablas and bongos, often work best when panned a little bit to each side. Try and split up the instruments so you have an equal number on each side of the stereo field to keep the mix sounding balanced, and not like one side of your drums is louder than the other. With low toms you might need to cut some of the lower frequencies out to keep from clashing with bass drum. With higher toms the opposite is true, except that we're trying to keep from clashing with the snare. I recommend very low Q values for this kind of work, it keeps things sounding more natural, gentle shaping is what we're usually after.

Pads, Chords, and Background Vocals

The main function of these elements is usually to support the harmonic or tonal aspects of the song. The key word being support, so you need to make sure that they do their job in the song, but don't overpower the main elements. These are usually the parts I get a bit more heavy handed with when it comes to EQ during the mix. Well, actually I tend to just create them with very narrow frequency ranges in the first place, but you can do the same thing after the fact with EQ.

In general I find that they need very little low end to do the job, and that way they don't clash or bury the main components of the lower end of things, namely the bassline and kick. So you might roll off everything below 600Hz, as well as maybe some top end too, unless it's a very 'airy' pad sound. Usually panning is the best way to make these fit in the song, though things like reverb and stereo delay can also be used to make them sit further back in the mix too. Panning delays are fun here, but as always don't overdo it to the point that it detracts from the main song elements.

Another trick is to double these tracks, or create a copy of the track in your DAW. Then delay one track by 4-5ms, and pan it all the way left, and the other one all the way right. This spreads them out to the far sides of the mix, and gives a neat detuning sort of effect. You can also do this with synth pads, but detune the left side by positive 3-7 cents, and the right side by negative 3-7 cents.

Once again, double check to make sure that you're not hitting that master meter above -6dBFS. If you are, the easiest way to fix this is to temporarily group all the tracks (if your DAW supports this) and lower the level of all the tracks at once. If you're DAW doesn't support track grouping *cough* Ableton Live *cough*, then you'll need to go and lower the faders of each track by the same amount. The easiest way is to do this numerically. Look at the dB value readout for each fader position, and type in a new number that's say 3dB less than this. The actual value will depend on your song and how high the master level meter was showing of course. Just be sure you subtract the same amount from each track.

Sound Effects and Ear Candy

Sometimes it's the little things that can make a song really fun to listen to, and that's what I'm referring to when I say ear candy. Those weird sound effects, fills, and transitional elements that add interest and variety to the song. Really not too much specific to do with these sounds, just remember to not have them so loud that they take away from the rest of the song.

This is especially important for sound effects you might use coming out of a drop or breakdown. When the song kicks back in, you want the song elements to have all that impact and focus, not the sound effect before them. So if the effects are too loud when the drums and bass come back, they might sound wimpy all of a sudden in comparison. EQ can really help with this, if you remove a lot of the lower frequencies, the effects can have a bit more volume, and the main elements of the song with still hit hard when they come back in.

In general I'd say that it's the sound effects and other small elements that can make a song hard to mixdown. If they clash with other areas of the songs in terms of frequencies, things can just sound messy and cluttered. So use EQ or synthesis to really shape each sound to have it's own space in the mix.

Putting It All Together

Hopefully by now your mixdown is 95% of the way there, and everything has it's own place. All your tracks should be unmuted and playing back together. I recommend taking a ten minute break and going outside for a bit. I find that being out in the 'open' sort of re-calibrates my ears if you will, and gives my listening a break from the 'sound of my room'. Vague concepts, I know, but your ears likely need a break and this is a good time to take it. Ideally you'd take an even longer break, overnight perhaps, but I know that won't happen so at least take ten minutes.

When you come back to listen to the mix, you'll probably notice one or two parts that sound too loud or quiet so adjust those as needed, so go ahead and do any little volume corrections you think the tune needs. Listen and make sure you can hear all the tracks in your song at the right times. If not, think about about if you really need them or not after all. Parts that don't really add much to the song just add to the clutter, so don't be afraid to remove them. It's not easy I know, especially if you've spent a lot of time on them. But you have to keep the SONG in your mind as the important part, not the individual parts. If nothing else, render out unneeded parts and save them for use in another song, that makes it easier to delete tracks in my experience.

Listen to the song all the way through a few times. Get up and move around your room as you listen, or maybe listen from the a hallway or another room nearby. Can you still hear the main parts of the song? Is there any part that sounds too loud everywhere but your studio? Try playing the mixdown back at different volumes, from really quiet to really loud (neighbors depending). Try listening on different headphones too. Likely a lot of people will be listening on iPod ear buds these days, so those are good to have to check things on too. Listen to it in your car, or if you're really lucky, at a club on a big sound system.

The goal of all this is to adjust the mixdown to obtain the best possible compromise for making your song sound good on as many sources as possible. With practice you will eventually know how what you hear on your studio monitors will translate elsewhere, and you can skip some of these steps. But for now, it's a good idea to listen in as many places as possible. I firmly believe that you should NEVER find yourself saying "well, it sounds ok, but I can fix that in mastering". No no no, now is the time to get your song sounding exactly the way you want, just a little quieter at this point compared to other songs (see my mastering link above for more on this).

Don't be discouraged if it still doesn't sound exactly the way you want, you're learning, and experience only comes by repeatedly doing the same thing over and over. Sometimes it takes more than one mixdown attempt to get it right. By going through and playing with EQ and spectrum analyzers while doing the first mix, you learn more about each part and how it fits with others in the song. Don't be afraid to remove all EQ, reset all levels to 0 and start over. Yes, it sucks sometimes, but most of the time doing this a second time works much better. I bet you end up needing to use a lot less EQ on the 2nd try, which can be a case of once again less being more.

Compression

Some of you will likely have noticed that I haven't mentioned compression yet when talking about mixdowns. That's because I personally feel that it's over-used these days, and that it's best to try and get the mix right without it first. Sometimes however, it can help situations, so if all else fails, don't be afraid to try it. The subject of compression is one I plan on covering in more detail in a later guide as it's a subject best discussed with audio examples to listen to, so I won't go into much detail here.

However there's a few quick tips I can pass on, such as the so called "New York Trick" for adding compression to drums. Basically you create a send or buss track in your DAW, and place your compressor on that with a very fast and hard setting. You're going to really squash things on this channel, but that's ok. You send a copy of all of the drum sounds to this compression channel, and really compress the life out of them, it's one time to go overboard with compression. The compressor helps merge all the seperate drum sounds into one huge drum sound, and you blend this compressed version of the drums in with the completely uncompressed version. You're basically doubling the drums, one uncompressed version that retains all it's transients, and quieter version of them all heavily squashed together underneath. It's a good way to give the drum more punch, without destroying all the transients. But again, sometimes it can ruin the drums too, so don't think this is something that always sounds better.

A quick and easy way to set up a compressor for other instruments is to set the attack to it's max amount, and the decay to the fastest setting. Set the ratio to 3 or 5, and lower the threshold until you're seeing about 3dB on the gain reduction meter on the plug in. Set the make up gain to auto if the compressor has this, or raise it to the same amount you see on the gain reduction meter if it doesn't. Now you can play with the attack and release settings to get the sound you're after. Lowering the attack setting will sort of dull the sound a bit, which might be good for say tweaky synth parts or basslines. Raising the release will give things like drums and percussion more 'oomph', just be careful not to go too high or you'll get the compressor pumping, which may not be a sound you're after.

Regardless, compression is one of those things that's entirely dependent on the sound you're feeding it, so it's pointless to discuss it in too much detail. It's best to teach yourself what all the controls do, and then spend time experimenting with each one on different source material.

Wrapping Up

Sometimes our ears just don't work right on some days, and nothing you do is going to help it. Or maybe they're just fatigued from being forced to listen critically in ways you've never done before. Don't stress over it, just save the project file and come back to it another day, or even a week later if you have the patience. The more you do this, the better you get, there's no shortcut to learning the art and skills of mixing, except to do it as much as you can! Look at it as practice, instead of a wasted day if that helps.

Just don't give up! When you're done with the mixdown, ideally the mastering engineer (or you) will have to do nothing but convert it from 24bit to 16bit, add dither, and raise the level a bit. That should be the goal of all producers, to produce a mixdown that doesn't need any other processing done to it!

Feel free to pass this document on as you see fit, though I ask that you do not modify it from it's current form, and give proper credit. If you see any errors, please let me know so I can correct them asap.

Tarekith
Tarekith.com

"Kick Drum 'o' Kick Drum"

I am sucking on my kicks. i layer em, compress em, shower em then send em home in a cab and still they are weak. any tips on putting together a nice sounding kick? I usually try to layer an acoustic drum with a synthesized drum then add compression but am always unable get nice round n punchy kick sound.

So aside like a dirty whore, how do you treat your kicks?

Any tips are appreciated...
____________________________________

* This helped me out a bit and gave me a good idea how to start out my drumz...Now i use a combo of using this and alot of layers of drums. peep the link, if your not using Ableton, the idea still applies i guess...this has helped but not the cure all...im sure there are other tips out there.

http://sonictransfer.com/kick-drum-design-tutorial.shtml

* You have to choose a nice and round subby kick, make sure it doesn't sound muddy, if it does, EQ to fix it. Then for the attack choose a kick by your choice, but filter the low end, you can also use a short hi-hat over the while thing. Focus on the EQ though...

* Also, look into key-inputting a 50-65 hz tone through a gate. This oscilated tone can be triggered by your kick, emitting the LFO tone and it'll suppliment your low end nicely.

* I've found you can't just layer em at will.. if the tunings of multiple kicks don't line up right you'll end up with phasing problems, which reduces the low end.

If you have low end heavy speakers you might not be able to tell this is happening, listen through headphones to see how the sound changes as you play the layers together versus separate. Finetune the tunings so that the samples sympathize with each other. Also, make sure the kicks are starting at the same point (no space up front), this can effect phasing as well.

It's also important to keep the faders of all your tracks somewhat low. The most important thing to getting a big kick is to turn it up in relation to the rest of the tracks, but as you build a track the kick can get lost. Just turn it up..

Sometimes it is also helpful to roll off the low end of a kick... the real subs, like below 50hz with a tight Q. This let's you bring up the volume of the kick in a meaningful way. Also, don't put compression on it unless you're after something specific, like the attack is too clicky. Try to get the source - the actual samples - to be as good as possible without compression first.

It can also be helpful to roll off the high end. This gives the kick a warmer sound, and can make a track sound less cluttered, but it depends on the track.

Always be careful that you're not clipping. If your source is a sampler, and you have layered a few samples, you are probably clipping the output of the sampler. Bring the main volume within that sampler down... The kick track's fader position should not match the kick track's volume readout.. ie: if you have the fader at -6 db, you shouldn't see the volume of that track hitting -6 db, it should be less. Clipping like this will make the sound less smooth and natural.

* I always use a 909 kick (recorded from my hardware novation drumstation) for the low end. remove some of the mid and top from this one. Then add a kick on top for the mid and highs (eq lows out). tune it until they match and then gentle compress the 2 to "glue" them.

In a track I always program a close hat on all the counts (1 5 9 13) to add some extra highs. (or a short open, tambourine ect)

In a track, if the mid is a bit muddy, eq some out around 250 - 300 hz. the kick gets "rounder". also eq some of the really lows out to make room for your bassline.
__________________________________
The end...

The Physics of Sound

I found a helpful article that will teach you some fundamentals about audio. If you have ever wondered what a sound wave actually is, or what’s behind all the complex audio terminology, take a few moments to read this article and fill yourself in on the background knowledge that will give you the upper hand as a producer.

When you have studied this section you should know:

* what sound is caused by
* what a sound wave is
* what a cycle is
* what frequency is
* what a hertz is
* what a pure tone is

* what is meant by fundamental frequency
* what an overtone is
* what an harmonic is
* what a timbre is
* what a starting transient is
* what periodic motion is
* what an octave is
* what phase is
* what a wavefront is
* what wavelength is
* what the speed of sound is
* what amplitude is
* what intensity is
* what loudness is
* how the ear adjusts to different intensities of sound
* what causes reinforcement and cancellation
* how sound spreads
* how sound “shadows” are formed
* what distortion is
* what reflection and absorption are
* what refraction is
* what ambient noise is
* what system noise is
* what resonance is

Copy and paste the link below for full artical...

http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~bunce/sound.htm

All about Drums...

This was copped from UGH.net written by Bernard Jones...

Well...

If your mindful of your sequence and know what you want out of it I personally see no harm in bouncing down every so often to save on space and cpu etc etc.

I mean if my kit is sounding sweet I'll render a few pieces of it wet and delete the main tracks and keep the bounced version in the mix... it works for me.

But when you look at it as a whole... 25 tracks of "drums" isn't really that bad to establish groove. Doubling kicks and other percussion can really create new sounds and push them into the mix... you just have to do it till it sounds full. Understand that there are going to be sounds that you are playing as percussive pieces and they have to sit in your drum mix right.... Like remember when Joey used to use the Mario Brother's Fireball sound all the time. I'm sure he was tracking that out in his percussion arrangement... Like another part of the drum kit. I all works out in the end and you can really spice your tracks up by adding subtle things here and there.

Creating swing can be simple or as complicated as you like it.... Cubase in Joey's case is known for a dope ass swing setting you can litterally turn the swing up and... bang... hot shuffle!

Some people like to allign their samples and notation to fit a swing type of setting. Taking each sample by hand and moving it in time till it is humanized or swung to taste.

Also for Live users....

There is a little "0" next to the metronome. It's your swing setting. Use it to taste. When using it on your samples and notation understand that ableton has a swing setting in the bottom left corner of the sample window and you need to set this to divy the sample at 16, 32 or straight 4 over 4. Use it only on things you INTENTIONALLY want to humanize or swing... because if you lay it on a sample that is not meant to be swung in the mix it will shift the sound enough to where you hear artifacts and displeasing harmonics in the case of re-pitch. I usually when writing in a swing style set my master swing to about 30-60 to taste, set my drum and MIDI samples and notes to swing 16 for kicks and effects... swing 32 for highs and snares. Keeping my bass at a straight setting and melodics as well. Give it a whirl and see what you come up with.... and never be affraid to turn off your quantize for a bit and move the samples by hand too....
____________________

This was copped from UGH.net written by Nate Laurence out of Minneapolis...

*Another trick is to do some layering with your hi-hats. You want to hit the full range of sound so lay down a low-hat, mid-hat, and bright-hat on top of each other. Then, in Reason, shift one of those hat layers off just a little. It will give you that "swing" effect. Just a trick I use.


____________________

This was copped from UGH.net written by Scrubfish out of Chicago...

*I would say approach your beats with the effort you would put into the rest of your track.. For the longest time i would throw a beat together in a minute. Throw a kick down, some hatz, and a clap. Wasn't the main focus of my tracks. I later realized that beats are the heart of your tracks and time must be taken on them. Unless you are going minimal on the beat..

I AM NO MASTER AND NOR DO I THINK I AM , but this is what i have dealt with in my productions and i am still working at it..

I think a big part of it is that you have to layer kicks, hatz, and claps to get a phat sound.

Listen to the different frequencies and figure out which fill out the range you want. Ghost samples do a great deal. (samples that are there but to untrained ears you wouldnt know it. hell even trained ears probably wont hear it in someones end product, but you can tell the difference because you can take it out and put it back in.) You may have a kick underneath another kick, and probably will not hear it a great deal. Doing this will give you a wider range and accent the kick all together..
Try using a kick with a higher freq snap on it, and then underline it with a low end or mid range kick, or both. sometime you will use three different kicks to get a full round kick. But when it comes to adding a bassline you may have to work around that and reinvent a kick. If you have a low end bassline like a sub and a real low end kick they might conflict and cancel each other out. I like to stick to a mid range kick so it gives my bassline room to breath. You can always find a bass that will work with the beat if you do not want to change it, or you can try compressing the kick and bass together and see what happens. there are so many different scenarios and you gotta find what works for you.

If you dont want to use the swing feature in programs you can draw all your beat hits out on the line. then go back through and slightly move a set of the drum sequence to be off. Example: Your Kick is four on and your clap is every other . you can select your hat track and slightly move it off line. You may also want to set of your claps with that too. Snares, mostly get offset. Those and ghost hats help the beat feel more swung. Also think of offseting the layered samples as well. you may have a clap on line, but if you offset the layer clap by just a little, that will give you a phater clap sound. Doing this is a bit more work, but end result is really nice. Listen to hip hop when it comes to phat snares and kicks. I think they have, or had the market on that shit..

Also you can just play your drums and do not quantize. that will give your beats a natural swing. You can later decide what you want on and go in to those parts and quantize them.
Just look at your beats as if a drummer were actually playing them live. They will never be exactly on, so when you make your beats you have to go a slight bit out of line and then back in, or slightly off the whole time. I guess you could equate the feeling of your drum pattern as a feeling of one of joey's filter movements in his tracks. If it was visual you might see it as an up and down motion and a left to right motion like a pendulum. If that makes any sense. (thats how i see it. Im sure its different for everyone)

I would imagine that these techniques have been around forever its just a person finding them and being able to incorporate them in thier own work. Spend some time making beats, and just beats. Start fucking with shit to see what happens.

As for doing what someone else is doing.....I think imitating is how we learn, and once we have it we can break those rules to make something different.. We get our inspiration from other people sometimes..You cant tell me that the big producers got thier inspiration only from themselves.. If that was true they wouldnt be sampling the shit out of everything. Crate diggers and sound diggers get inspired by shit that someone has already done.. Now dont get me wrong.... The guys holding it down in house are fucking insane creative, but the inspiration started somewhere..Someone will do something catchy and you might want to do something like that. I thought that is how house music creates genres and perpetuates the creation of new sounding music......We gotta start somehwere and if no one is there to help us then how else would we learn if not by imitating(this could be a whole different disscussion) If it sounds phat and you like it, go with it man..


latz.. scrubfish

by the way ... my beats suck ass.. pz